Australia’s most popular seminars for Health Professionals

Five commonest areas that lead to lack of informed consent litigation

  • Two-thirds of cases involved surgical procedures, the majority related to five adverse outcomes: 
  • 1-the need for further surgery, 
  • 2-poor cosmetic result, 
  • 3-impaired vision or hearing, 
  • 4-chronic pain,
  • 5-infertility or sexual dysfunction.

  • The most common justifications doctors gave for non-disclosure were that the risk was too rare to warrant discussion or the specific risk was covered by a more general risk that was discussed. Although most informed consent disputes appear to involve disagreements about who said what and when, not stand-offs over whether a particular risk ought to have been disclosed, doctors may routinely underestimate the importance of a small set of risks that vex patients. Read the full report below:

PLoS Medicine: Legal Disputes over Duties to Disclose Treatment Risks to Patients: A Review of Negligence Claims and Complaints in Australia.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>