0 hours
These are activities that expand general practice knowledge, skills and attitudes, related to your scope of practice.
0.5 hours
These are activities that require reflection on feedback about your work.
0 hours
These are activities that use your work data to ensure quality results.
These are activities that expand general practice knowledge, skills and attitudes, related to your scope of practice.
These are activities that require reflection on feedback about your work.
These are activities that use your work data to ensure quality results.
Given the widespread availability of alcohol, risky drinking patterns often go unrecognised. In Australia, around 21% of adults drink at hazardous levels, yet only a quarter recognise the potential harm to their health.
Most people who engage in risky drinking do not meet criteria for alcohol use disorder, yet they are at increased risk of cancer, cardiovascular disease, injury, and psychiatric conditions. Because their drinking is not perceived as problematic, they are unlikely to seek help despite strong evidence supporting brief intervention in primary care.
Alcohol-related harm can be difficult to detect, as symptoms are often non-specific and may be attributed to other conditions, particularly when alcohol use is not openly disclosed.
Asking about alcohol as part of standard history taking allows earlier identification of risk. When concerns emerge, a structured 10-minute assessment provides a practical framework for intervention.
Where time allows, a detailed addiction history should explore each substance and addictive behaviour individually. Patients often do not recognise certain behaviours as clinically relevant, so broad, general questions are rarely enough. It is more effective to ask specifically about alcohol, tobacco, prescribed medications, illicit substances, and addictive behaviours.
For each substance, clarify:
Pay particular attention to early exposure to alcohol. Ask directly about age of first use and address the misconception that early introduction promotes responsible drinking. Early exposure is one of the strongest predictors of later dependence, and it’s important to be clear about that.
Seeking collateral information can strengthen assessment accuracy. Check prescription monitoring systems such as SafeScript, involve family members when clinically suitable, and arrange structured follow-up. These steps improve diagnostic clarity and reinforce continuity of care.
Finally, ask explicitly what alcohol (or the substance) provides for the patient. Acknowledging the short-term benefits their alcohol use provides whilst also discussing harm facilitates a collaborative relationship. Framing their alcohol use as something that helps them get through today while compromising tomorrow validates the patient’s experience and can help create change in their behaviour as it assures the patient you want to address the underlying issue, not just deprive them of their main coping mechanism.
In routine practice, extended assessments are rarely feasible. A structured 10-minute alcohol assessment allows meaningful intervention within standard consultation time.
This assessment comprises six stages, each tied directly to an action, so the assessment itself becomes the intervention rather than a purely diagnostic exercise.
The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) is a standardised 10-item screening tool. In time-limited consultations, the abbreviated AUDIT-C provides rapid and effective risk stratification. The AUDIT-C uses the first three questions of the AUDIT, scoring each response from 0–4 with the total score used to stratify risk.
1. How often do you have a drink containing alcohol?
a. Never (0)
b. Monthly or less (1)
c. 2–4 times a month (2)
d. 2–3 times a week (3)
e. 4 or more times a week (4)
2. How many standard drinks do you have each time you are drinking?
a. 1 or 2 (0)
b. 3 or 4 (1)
c. 5 or 6 (2)
d. 7 to 9 (3)
e. 10 or more (4)
3. How often do you have six or more standard drinks?
a. Never (0)
b. Less than monthly (1)
c. Monthly (2)
d. Weekly (3)
e. Daily or almost daily (4)
Scores stratify risk as follows:
Hazardous drinking represents a large, modifiable group that is particularly responsive to brief intervention when identified early.
Action: SBIRT and harm reduction
For low-risk patients, reinforce safe limits and help patients maintain them. The goal is to maintain low-risk behaviour. Confirm that intake remains within national guidelines (no more than 10 standard drinks per week and no more than 4 on any one day). Encourage at least two alcohol-free days each week. Advise slowing the rate of intake by spacing drinks and alternating alcoholic beverages with non-alcoholic drinks (water, non-alcoholic beers, etc). Recommend avoiding alcohol on an empty stomach to reduce rapid absorption.
For patients drinking at hazardous levels, prioritise practical harm reduction while broader change is being considered. Recommend specific pacing strategies, encourage non-daily drinking, and suggest lower-strength options where appropriate. Prescribe thiamine when drinking exceeds guideline levels. Do not assume abstinence is the immediate goal unless clinically indicated.
Before advising reduction, always assess withdrawal risk. Ask directly about daily heavy use, morning drinking, previous withdrawal symptoms, and any history of seizures. If these features are present, arrange supervised withdrawal or specialist AOD referral rather than unsupported reduction in primary care.
Motivation should be explored carefully to reduce defensiveness. Rather than asking directly whether someone drinks too much, begin with broader, open-ended questions about overall wellbeing, functioning, and perceived impact. This allows patterns to emerge before explicitly linking alcohol use to identified difficulties.
Readiness to change scaling can then be used to gauge motivation while preserving autonomy. Ask where the patient sits on a 0–10 scale (0 = no desire to change; 10 = strong desire to change) and what would move them one point higher. This keeps the conversation collaborative and supports incremental change.
Action: brief intervention and structured follow-up
Provide clear feedback, explore discrepancies between goals and behaviour, support self-efficacy, establish small measurable goals, and arrange structured follow-up. Even modest reductions are clinically meaningful. Follow-up is central to progress and should be prioritised as part of the intervention strategy. Where appropriate, involving a supportive family member in follow-up can strengthen accountability and reinforce change.
Studies show that even brief interventions can lead to meaningful reductions in alcohol consumption, alcohol-related harms, and hospitalisations. A useful resource is the 2018 Australian Prescriber article by Craig Rogers, which outlines how to deliver brief interventions in general practice.
Begin by exploring function rather than alcohol itself. Ask about work, study, relationships, finances, and day-to-day stressors before directly attributing difficulties to drinking. Patterns often emerge without confrontation, reducing defensiveness and increasing insight. Once concerns are identified, gently link them back to alcohol use where appropriate.
Safety screening should remain explicit. Ask directly about drink driving, drinking while responsible for children, aggression at home, and escalating conflict related to alcohol.
Action: behavioural targeting and safety intervention
Reflect functional consequences back to the patient and collaboratively identify specific behavioural targets. Intervene immediately where safety risks are identified.
Alcohol frequently serves as self-medication. When assessing underlying drivers, consider screening for common coexisting conditions such as depression, anxiety, trauma and PTSD, bipolar disorder, insomnia, and suicidality.
Many patients find alcohol helpful in the short term. Acknowledge and validate the immediate relief it may provide, while clearly explaining the longer-term effects on mood, sleep, and overall health. Patients often respond well when this explanation is supported by clear evidence and concrete examples, as it signals that the discussion is grounded in research rather than personal criticism.
A few useful papers include Hunt et al when discussing the dose-dependent relationship between alcohol use disorder severity and depression or anxiety, Conroy et al when explaining alcohol’s impact on REM sleep and emotional regulation and Esmaeelzadeh et al when outlining the bidirectional relationship between trauma and alcohol misuse.
Action: address both the cause and the alcohol use
Emphasise that alcohol is simultaneously masking and worsening symptoms. Sustainable improvement in mood, anxiety, trauma, and sleep requires addressing alcohol use alongside the underlying condition.
Wernicke’s encephalopathy may be missed in clinical practice, as the classic triad of confusion, ataxia and ophthalmoplegia is only present in around 10% of cases. In patients drinking at hazardous levels, cognitive slowing, ataxia, or any neurological change should prompt suspicion of thiamine deficiency. Alcohol contributes to deficiency through impaired absorption, reduced nutritional intake, and depletion of hepatic stores.
Action: thiamine supplementation and urgent referral when indicated
Prescribe therapeutic-dose thiamine in patients drinking above guideline levels, typically 100 mg daily and continued for at least six months following cessation. If Wernicke’s is suspected, arrange urgent referral for parenteral thiamine and neuro imaging. Low-dose B-complex preparations (10–12 mg) are inadequate for prevention or treatment.
Alcohol affects multiple organ systems and warrants systematic evaluation. Perform a focused physical examination, including abdominal assessment and cardiovascular review. Order liver function tests and assess synthetic function (albumin, INR, bilirubin), as these reflect different aspects of liver injury and severity. Consider ECG in those at risk, and further cardiac evaluation where indicated. In women, consider bone health assessment where appropriate.
Each additional daily drink increases breast cancer risk by approximately 7–10%. Consuming two or more standard drinks per day is associated with a 1.5-fold increase in colorectal cancer risk. Approximately five to six per cent of all cancers in Australia are attributable to alcohol use. Alcohol-related cardiomyopathy and atrial fibrillation are common and frequently under-recognised. Pancreatitis and gastritis are also common complications.
Distinguishing between elevated liver enzymes and impaired synthetic function is critical, as they reflect different stages of disease severity.
Action: risk communication and medical management
Link investigation findings and quantified risks directly to behavioural recommendations and incorporate them into a structured management plan.
Based on this educational activity, complete these learning modules to gain additional CPD.
Listen to expert interviews.
Click to open in a new tab
Browse the latest articles from Healthed.
Once you confirm you’ve read this article you can complete a Patient Case Review to earn 0.5 hours CPD in the Reviewing Performance (RP) category.
Select ‘Confirm & learn‘ when you have read this article in its entirety and you will be taken to begin your Patient Case Review.
