Articles / Nutrition for maintaining muscle while taking GLP-1 RAs


writer
Principal Dietitian and Founder, The Nutrition Code; Senior Dietitian, Endocrinology Team, Royal Melbourne Hospital
0 hours
These are activities that expand general practice knowledge, skills and attitudes, related to your scope of practice.
0.5 hours
These are activities that require reflection on feedback about your work.
0 hours
These are activities that use your work data to ensure quality results.
These are activities that expand general practice knowledge, skills and attitudes, related to your scope of practice.
These are activities that require reflection on feedback about your work.
These are activities that use your work data to ensure quality results.
But alongside the impressive results, questions remain: weight loss at what cost? Can patients sustain healthy eating patterns, preserve muscle mass, and maintain long-term wellbeing while on treatment?
Many people eligible for GLP-1 therapy already have poor baseline diet quality. GLP-1 RAs can further reduce overall food intake, sometimes by as much as 40% of usual dietary volume, because of their appetite-suppressing effects. While this reduction is central to weight loss, it also increases the risk that nutritional inadequacies that were present before treatment may emerge or worsen during therapy.
A 2025 US study of adults using GLP-1 RAs for more than one month highlighted several concerns. Average fibre intake was only 50–60% of daily requirements. Protein intake averaged around 77 g/day, which falls well below the 1.2–1.6 g/kg body weight typically recommended for those losing weight. In addition, calcium, iron, vitamin D, zinc, potassium, and magnesium intakes were frequently below 75% of recommended levels.
Similarly to those who undergo bariatric surgery, patients taking GLP-1 RAs also need ongoing monitoring of vitamins, minerals and overall dietary intake.
On top of reduced nutritional intake, gastrointestinal side effects such as nausea, constipation, diarrhoea, reflux, and heartburn are common early complaints. For many patients, these issues are the first barrier to sustaining good nutrition, as they influence both how much and what people eat. Although commonly dose-related, temporary, and manageable, they can still have a marked impact on diet quality.
Patients with gastrointestinal issues often choose bland foods such as toast, crackers, or instant noodles to ease the discomfort, further increasing the risk of dietary inadequacy.
For GPs, a brief dietary recall during a consultation can flag risk. Where fatigue, reduced exercise tolerance, weakness, hair loss, impaired immune function or other red flags appear, a micronutrient screen may be appropriate to check iron, B12/folate, zinc, magnesium etc. Encouraging patients to include protein with every meal, through lean meats, fish, legumes, eggs or dairy, can help bridge the most common gaps.
In this context, early dietary advice can reduce symptom-related attrition and set the tone for better food quality.
While patients are understandably thrilled with weight loss results, the quality of weight lost is critical. Research suggests that between 20% and 40% of the weight lost with GLP-1 therapy may come from lean mass, including skeletal muscle and bone. For example, findings from the SURMOUNT-1 trial suggest that around 25% of total weight lost on GLP-1 RAs came from lean muscle mass and the remainder from fat mass. The loss of lean mass can have serious implications for metabolism, physical functioning, and risk of sarcopenic obesity.
In clinical trials, participants typically had frequent input from dietitians and exercise specialists but these resources aren’t always available in the community, making GPs the primary source of nutrition advice and support for many patients. This underscores the importance of patient education regarding lifestyle changes to reduce muscle loss.
Although less studied, some patients report reduced enjoyment of food, discomfort eating socially, or changes in taste preferences. These experiences may affect social engagement and mental wellbeing, and they are worth acknowledging during routine consultations. Normalising these changes and checking in on quality of life can be reassuring for patients and may prevent premature discontinuation of therapy.
One increasingly discussed adjunct is the use of diabetes-specific nutritional formulas (DSNFs). These specialised supplement drinks, available in pharmacies, are designed to support people with diabetes or pre-diabetes.
Typically, DSNFs are calorie controlled, high in protein, based on low GI carbohydrates with fibre, and contain predominantly unsaturated fats. They are also fortified with micronutrients that support metabolic health, including magnesium, calcium, zinc, B vitamins, vitamin D, chromium, and potassium. They can be used to replace a meal or snack, or to boost overall nutrient intake when appetite is low.
For patients on GLP-1 therapy, DSNFs can be particularly helpful. Early in treatment, some people tolerate liquids better than solids. Others may be skipping meals altogether or falling back on nutrient-poor foods. A DSNF offers a nutrient-dense, convenient alternative or supplement to a meal or snack. Clinical evidence suggests they not only improve glycaemic control and support weight loss, but also help preserve muscle mass during weight reduction.
For example, a 2017 trial by Chee and colleagues showed that patients with type 2 diabetes using DSNFs once or twice daily achieved a 1.1% HbA1c reduction over six months, compared with only 0.2% in the usual care group. This is important because each 1% reduction in HbA1c is associated with a 37% reduction in the risk of microvascular complications and a 14% reduction in the risk of myocardial infarction.
More recently, a 12-week trial by Tey et al in 2024 found that patients using DSNFs not only lost about twice as much weight as those receiving usual care, but most of this loss came from visceral fat while muscle mass was preserved or even increased, highlighting their potential role alongside GLP-1 therapy.
In practice, GPs might recommend DSNFs as:
A wholefood diet is always the preferred approach, but where it’s not feasible to meet all nutritional requirements through diet alone, DSNFs can be helpful.
Very low energy diets (VLEDs) like Optifast are designed for total meal replacement under medical supervision. DSNFs differ in that they are not intended for total diet replacement, can be used flexibly regardless of BMI, and are specifically formulated with lower GI and diabetes-supportive nutrient profiles. In short, VLEDs are designed for intensive, medically supervised short-term weight loss, while DSNFs are aimed at managing post prandial glycaemia, achieving a healthy body weight, nutritional adequacy and metabolic health.
Samantha Stuk is an accredited practising dietitian and director of The Nutrition Code.
Based on this educational activity, complete these learning modules to gain additional CPD.

Cardiovascular Risk and Fatty Liver Disease

Importance of Early & Effective Treatment of Mild to Moderate Acne

SGLT2s and Renal Protection

CV Medications – Practical Strategies to Improve Compliance

writer
Principal Dietitian and Founder, The Nutrition Code; Senior Dietitian, Endocrinology Team, Royal Melbourne Hospital


Very misleading
Moderately misleading
Slightly misleading
Not at all misleading
Listen to expert interviews.
Click to open in a new tab
Browse the latest articles from Healthed.
Once you confirm you’ve read this article you can complete a Patient Case Review to earn 0.5 hours CPD in the Reviewing Performance (RP) category.
Select ‘Confirm & learn‘ when you have read this article in its entirety and you will be taken to begin your Patient Case Review.
